1 resultado para Process Chemistry and Technology
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (3)
- Aquatic Commons (7)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (70)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (53)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (46)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (11)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (111)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (61)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (26)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (209)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (143)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (73)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
Resumo:
The field of archaeology incorporates a confusing assortment of ideas and approaches to the record. With studies ranging widely in ideology and goals, from strict descriptive materialism to sociological interpretation, language used to communicate key concepts (not to mention which concepts are key) also varies widely, resulting in low levels of mutual interest and intelligibility across the discipline. Archaeologists commonly ignore the majority of available literature as a result, further widening intellectual chasms.